Difference between revisions of "Information Classification"

From IMSMA Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
|}
 
|}
 
|}
 
|}
==Ordnance Classification==__NOEDITSECTION__
+
 
{|
 
|- valign="top"
 
|
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
! Code
 
! Evidence
 
! Information
 
! Source
 
|-
 
| M1
 
| Mines or UXO physically verified
 
| Confirmed
 
| Reliable
 
|-
 
| M2
 
| Area reported with observed evidence of mines or UXO
 
| Unconfirmed
 
| Reliable
 
|-
 
| M3
 
| Area reported with observed evidence of mines or UXO
 
| Unconfirmed
 
| Unreliable
 
|-
 
| M4
 
| Area reported as mined with no evidence of mines or UXO
 
| Unconfirmed
 
| Unreliable
 
|}
 
|
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
! colspan="4" | Exists in
 
|-
 
| width="100pt"| [[Land Summary Window | Land ]]
 
|}
 
|}
 
 
==Reliability of Information==__NOEDITSECTION__
 
==Reliability of Information==__NOEDITSECTION__
 
{|
 
{|
Line 137: Line 101:
 
[[Image:Reliability_info_source.png|500px]]
 
[[Image:Reliability_info_source.png|500px]]
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
{{NavBox Data Dictionary}}
 +
[[Category:NAA]]

Latest revision as of 12:55, 2 June 2014

The IMSMANG data model contains several fields that may be used for classification of the information.

Confirmed

Standard values
Yes No Unknown Not Specified
Exists in
Land Activity Accident Education

Reliability of Information

Standard values
1 2 3 4 5 6
Exists in
Land Activity Accident Education

Reliability of Source

Standard values
A B C D E F
Exists in
Land Activity Accident Education

How to interpret Reliability of Information and Source

Information Source
1 - Confirmed A - Reliable
2 - Possible B - In general reliable
3 - Less Possible C - Sufficiently reliable
4 - Doubtable D - Not always reliable
5 - Improbable E - Less reliable
6 - Not to be evaluated F - Reliability not valuable

Reliability info source.png