60
edits
Changes
no edit summary
* Average size of surveyed area
=== Comment from Russell about approaches and learning from other people's experience ===__NOEDITSECTION__
The key issue (I would go as far as to say the over-riding issue) about getting indicators into common use is the widespread negative perception by field operators. Mention indicators and the reaction is something like "that's all nonsense, no-one in the field has time to go around collecting page after page of data that is never going to be used anyway". This is almost a direct quote from a reaction I had from a colleague who is relatively positive about GIS and other technology, and seems to sum up the most common reaction.
As a result, it seems likely that the biggest problem to overcome is perception and acceptance, and technical issues are secondarythe second issue. In terms of an approach this means things like:* go for quick wins with indicators that may not be overall so useful but are very easy to data collect and produce obvious resultsso that people start to change the perception* try to find out what the biggest issue that needs addressed is in a given situation (i.e. which indicator is most requested) and decide if this is a feasible problem or not. If not feasible then ruthlessly set it aside and look at next most urgent. What we choose _not_ to do is going to be important. (ref to Steve Jobs: "there is no shortage of very good ideas, but you have to say no to all of them if you are going to work on the best ideas"). Don't be distracted by unrealistic expectations.
* in looking at indicators from other parallel development areas, we should focus not on the "technical" fit of the indicator to mine action as our first criterion, but at how well the indicator is accepted in the field. Build up a library of these and then look for common factors and characteristics in why and how they are accepted (and also maybe the timescale and process from first use to acceptance). If our main problem is perception then that must be addressed analytically as far as possible.
* accept that indicators are partial and indicative and generally only indicative of anything when it is too late, but that this is _far_ better than the alternative of working blind, hearsay and widespread accepted myths and lies about effectiveness and impact.
* remember that "doing the right job" is more important than "doing the job right" and look at how other sectors address the "right job" issue.
== References (external links) ==__NOEDITSECTION__
