Difference between revisions of "Evidence of Contamination"

From IMSMA Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "There are several fields that may be used for collecting Evidence of Contamination ==Ordnance Classification==__NOEDITSECTION__ {| |- valign="top" | {| class="wikitable" ! Co...")
 
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
There are several fields that may be used for collecting Evidence of Contamination
+
{{TOC right}}
 +
There are several fields in [[Land Summary Window | Land]] that may be used for collecting Evidence of Contamination
  
−
==Ordnance Classification==__NOEDITSECTION__
+
==Evidence of Contamination==__NOEDITSECTION__
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
! colspan="4" | Standard values
 +
|-
 +
| width="100pt"| Indirect
 +
| width="100pt"| Direct
 +
| width="100pt"| None
 +
| width="100pt"| Not Specified
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
==Indirect Evidence ==__NOEDITSECTION__
 +
Which type of Indirect Evidence should be specified and the standard values should be customised to the Mine Action Programmes's Nation Mine Action Standard (NMAS) because the what is considered to be Indirect Evidence in one MAP may be considered as Direct Evidence in another MAP.
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
! colspan="7" | Standard values
 +
|-
 +
| width="150pt"| Evidence from old survey
 +
| width="150pt"| Former combatant zone
 +
| width="150pt"| Mine/ERW accidents with unknown location
 +
| width="150pt"| Mine/ERW records (low reliability)
 +
| width="150pt"| Productive land not in use
 +
| width="150pt"| Verbal reports
 +
| width="150pt"| Not Specified
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
==Direct Evidence ==__NOEDITSECTION__
 +
Which type of Direct Evidence should be specified and the standard values should be customised to the Mine Action Programmes's Nation Mine Action Standard (NMAS) because the what is considered to be Direct Evidence in one MAP may be considered as Indirect Evidence in another MAP.
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
! colspan="6" | Standard values
 +
|-
 +
| width="170pt"| Detonations
 +
| width="170pt"| Mine/ERW accidents with known location
 +
| width="170pt"| Mine/ERW records (high reliability)
 +
| width="170pt"| Mine signs, fencing, etc.
 +
| width="170pt"| Visual observations
 +
| width="170pt"| Not Specified
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
==Land classification (former Mine Action Area Type)==__NOEDITSECTION__
 +
Depending on ''Evidence of Contamination'' and which ''Type of Contamination / Ordnance'' [[Land Summary Window | Land]] is classified as:
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
! Classification
 +
! Definition
 +
! Contamination
 +
|-
 +
| Indication
 +
| Used for inaccessible areas or areas with limited information available
 +
| Mines / UXO / IED
 +
|-
 +
| SHA
 +
| Strong indication of mine/ERW contamination on the basis of Indirect Evidence
 +
| Mines / UXO / IED
 +
|-
 +
| CHA
 +
| Confirmed contamination on the basis of direct evidence of the presence of mines/ERW
 +
| Mines / UXO / IED
 +
|-
 +
| Ammunition storage / Stockpile
 +
| The ordnance is stored in e.g. an armoury or a warehouse
 +
| All types
 +
|-
 +
| EOD Spot task
 +
| May be subsurface or surface
 +
| Not mines
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
==Ordnance Classification (former Device Classification)==__NOEDITSECTION__
 +
This field has existed in IMSMA before V6.0.
 
{|
 
{|
 
|- valign="top"
 
|- valign="top"
Line 31: Line 98:
 
| Unreliable
 
| Unreliable
 
|}
 
|}
−
|
+
 
−
{| class="wikitable"
+
{{NavBox Data Dictionary}}
−
! colspan="4" | Exists in
+
[[Category:NAA]]
−
|-
 
−
| width="100pt"| [[Land Summary Window | Land ]]
 
−
|}
 
−
|}
 

Latest revision as of 12:38, 6 October 2016

There are several fields in Land that may be used for collecting Evidence of Contamination

Evidence of Contamination

Standard values
Indirect Direct None Not Specified

Indirect Evidence

Which type of Indirect Evidence should be specified and the standard values should be customised to the Mine Action Programmes's Nation Mine Action Standard (NMAS) because the what is considered to be Indirect Evidence in one MAP may be considered as Direct Evidence in another MAP.

Standard values
Evidence from old survey Former combatant zone Mine/ERW accidents with unknown location Mine/ERW records (low reliability) Productive land not in use Verbal reports Not Specified

Direct Evidence

Which type of Direct Evidence should be specified and the standard values should be customised to the Mine Action Programmes's Nation Mine Action Standard (NMAS) because the what is considered to be Direct Evidence in one MAP may be considered as Indirect Evidence in another MAP.

Standard values
Detonations Mine/ERW accidents with known location Mine/ERW records (high reliability) Mine signs, fencing, etc. Visual observations Not Specified

Land classification (former Mine Action Area Type)

Depending on Evidence of Contamination and which Type of Contamination / Ordnance Land is classified as:

Classification Definition Contamination
Indication Used for inaccessible areas or areas with limited information available Mines / UXO / IED
SHA Strong indication of mine/ERW contamination on the basis of Indirect Evidence Mines / UXO / IED
CHA Confirmed contamination on the basis of direct evidence of the presence of mines/ERW Mines / UXO / IED
Ammunition storage / Stockpile The ordnance is stored in e.g. an armoury or a warehouse All types
EOD Spot task May be subsurface or surface Not mines

Ordnance Classification (former Device Classification)

This field has existed in IMSMA before V6.0.

Code Evidence Information Source
M1 Mines or UXO physically verified Confirmed Reliable
M2 Area reported with observed evidence of mines or UXO Unconfirmed Reliable
M3 Area reported with observed evidence of mines or UXO Unconfirmed Unreliable
M4 Area reported as mined with no evidence of mines or UXO Unconfirmed Unreliable
Item Data
DEFs
Geo data
Task
Auxiliary Data
Other
Retrieved from "http://mwiki.gichd.org:8090/mediawiki/index.php?title=Evidence_of_Contamination&oldid=22195"