Changes

Information Exchange

115 bytes added, 17:09, 3 April 2015
no edit summary
* who is the receiver?
* what will the receiver use the data/information for?
:* show contamination impact
:* input to operational planning
:* show the outcome of Mine Action
:* other purposes
* will the receiver share the data/information in his turn?
* how often?
:* MINT
:* website
 
==Collecting Regular Feedback==__NOEDITSECTION__
In any data/information exchange activity, it is important to have regular follow-up or meetings to collect feedback and discuss issues or improvements to the data/information exchange process. One recommendation is to establish a feedback forum where implementing partners and stakeholders can address data quality issues and make adjustments to the data/information exchange process. Topics to address in such a forum include:
 
* frequency of data/information exchange
* standardisation of reports and searches to be included in the central dataset
* permissions and role changes
* creation or modification of Auxiliary data
* which data to collect
* changes of templates
* output products like reports, statistics, maps
 
By collecting feedback on these points, information managers can help ensure that data/information exchange works as expected and set up a quality assurance mechanism to prevent data quality issues from affecting the Mine Action Programme.
==Workflows==__NOEDITSECTION__
By limiting Auxiliary data permissions to the Central Mine Action Authority, information managers can prevent complications when importing Data Entry Forms. Because Data Entry Forms refers to Auxiliary data, it is important that each country have one common set of Auxiliary data to facilitate exchange. If the Auxiliary data is not properly synchronised, the exchange of Data Entry Forms can result in import issues which must be manually resolved. While {{IMSMANG}} provides an interface for resolving these kinds of issues, it is recommended to reduce the occurrence of these issues by limiting any creation of Auxiliary data to the Central Mine Action Authority who can then distribute an updated dataset as necessary.
 
==Collecting Regular Feedback==__NOEDITSECTION__
In any data/information exchange activity, it is important to have regular follow-up or meetings to collect feedback and discuss issues or improvements to the data/information exchange process. One recommendation is to establish a feedback forum where implementing partners and stakeholders can address data quality issues and make adjustments to the data/information exchange process. Topics to address in such a forum include:
 
* frequency of data/information exchange
* standardisation of reports and searches to be included in the central dataset
* permissions and role changes
* creation or modification of Auxiliary data
* which data to collect
* changes of templates
* output products like reports, statistics, maps
 
By collecting feedback on these points, information managers can help ensure that data/information exchange works as expected and set up a quality assurance mechanism to prevent data quality issues from affecting the Mine Action Programme.
{{NavBox Getting started with IMSMA}}
[[Category:DSA]]
6,632
edits