Changes

| align="left" | No costs

| align="left" | Easy and automatic

|-

| align="left" | '''2 - Number of distinct organizations accessing MINT in a given time frame'''

| align="left" | No costs, but has to be set up/customised at the beginning

| align="left" | Easy and automatic, given that a clear separation of orgs exists (either based on roles or sub-organisations)

|-

| align="left" | '''3 - Are the key decision-makers (identified during requirements gathering) using MINT? Level of engagement (conditional agreement / full agreement / enthusiasm)? Resource allocation (possible / in progress / funded)? '''

| align="left" | Mine Action Programme

| align="left" | Follow-up interview/questionnaire by IM focal point, or IM assessment

| align="left" | Twice per year

| align="left" | Minimal, can be done remotely

| align="left" | Easy if a good relation exists with the key people in programmes; risk of not getting the information or getting wrong information - but this can be cross-checked by indicators 1 and 2.

|-

| align="left" | '''4 - Frequency of checking objectives/targets against results/data. How often do you KNOW if activities are on track? '''

| align="left" | Mine Action Programme

| align="left" | Follow-up interview/questionnaire by IM focal point, or IM assessment

| align="left" | Twice per year

| align="left" | Minimal, can be done remotely

| align="left" | Easy if a good relation exists with the key people in programmes; risk of not getting the information or getting wrong information - but this can be cross-checked by indicators 1 and 2.

|-

|}