NoPublic, bureaucrat, administrator
1,068
edits
Changes
no edit summary
This page summarises an initial, internal brainstorming on indicators.
== Principles for the development of indicators ==
=== From a presentation from DDG: ===
* '''Valid''' - Does the indicator directly represent the change it is intended to measure? Is the change within the scope of the project?
* '''Objective''' - Is the definition precise, simple and unambiguous about what is to be measured?
* '''Reliable''' - Is the data needed to measure the indicator consistent or comparable over time?
* '''Practical''' - Can data be collected easily, on a timely basis and at reasonable costs?
* '''Useful''' - Will the indicator data be useful for programme decision-making and learning?
* '''Owned''' - Do the local communities and programme management agree that this indicator makes sense?
=== Other approaches? ===
== Categories of indicators ==
This is just to have different sets of indicators, for different levels/purposes/areas...
* Output-level indicators
* Outcome-level indicators
* Performance indicators
* Impact-level indicators?
* Activity-level indicators?
== Collection of indicators ==
This is an initial collection of indicators encountered so far in the mine action context. '''It is not yet an assessment regarding their applicability/usefulness/relevance!'''
=== Indicators mentioned in the Copenhagen initiative output document: ===
{| class="wikitable"
! Outcomes
! Indicators
|-
| '''Physical and Psychological Safety'''
* Reduced number of mine/ERW related accidents/incidents reported in area of operation
* Reduced at-risk behaviours of target population at high risk of a mine/ERW accident
* Increased feeling of safety among beneficiaries
|
* Number of mine/ERW accidents/incidents
* Number of beneficiaries at risk of a mine/ERW related death or injury
* Number of reported instances of unsafe behaviour
* Level of awareness about mines/ERW in at-risk communities
* Level of concern about mines/ERW on the part of the target population
* Level of confidence in use of released land by target population
|-
| '''Land Use and Livelihoods'''
* Released land contributing to improved livelihoods
* Safe access to previously contaminated land
* Improved productive use of released land
|
* Proportion of released land put into productive use
* Number of people directly benefitting from use of released land
* Numbers of people accessing previously blocked resources and infrastructure
|-
| '''National Mine Action Ownership'''
* Improved national ability to oversee, manage and implement mine action activities
|
* Realistic estimation of mine and ERW problem
* Proportion of mine action activities driven by national strategy
* Level of national implementation capacity
* Level of compliance of database and information management system with national and international standards
* Proportion of mine action budget funded by national contribution
* Percentage of national staff in management and operational advisory positions
|}
[[Category:NoPublic]]